The phone call over, time for some good ol' chai and newspaper routine. One thing I really love about Sunday Mornings - is the newspaper. Nowadays, it is almost the size of a small book (I wonder how come nobody has filed a Public Interest Litigation for the amount of trees they demolish for making one newspaper out of it) - but it is entertaining nonetheless. The editorials and the HT Brunch are usually nice read. Today, HT brunch has the 'Twitter Phenomena' on its cover. Twitter or the microblogging concept is the latest craze that has seemed to catch everyone's attention. On reading the article, I felt, that blogs like mine have now become equivalent to Test Cricket whose fate is being debated in light of the latest onslaught of T-20 version of blogging. Some old wisecrack might soon ominously comment - there is scope for both formats to co-exist peacefully (smile)!!!
The first thing I noticed about the article on Twitter is the slang that it seems to have developed - like a language of its own. For instance, tweets for microblogs or twitterati (people most followed on twitter ? i guess). The article also made a unfavourable reference to its networking cousins - Facebook and Orkut. According to that article, to be on Twitter, and be followed by other people - your opinion should be respected - and that can come only from being of a slightly older (or read as wiser) age-group. I don't think the parents of Twitter would like this sort of classification (tantamount to repelling the young crowd - which in 'Young India' (sic), would be nothing less than sacrilige). I don't think the article got it right. Methinks tweets are as good as their cousins. What Mallika sherawat or Priyanka chopra did for the day - is 'not' infinitely wiser than selling vegetables using farmville on Facebook (smile).
I am a little confused with the options available for social networking. Though I haven't explored any one in detail, and, my knowledge about each is as undercooked as any for a reasonable opinion, I wonder whether any of these serves any role other than entertainment. It is for this reason that I am a little wary of starting out on Twitter, lest it meets the fate of my Facebook account. Let me explain. When I first joined Orkut, I thot it was fun. I could actually meet people from forgotten eras and it was fun till it lasted. Then, the orkut msges became increasingly clipped - 'Long time no hear' types. Then Facebook came along. Though i signed up for a Facebook account, i never really warmed up to it. I had already made the connections during the Orkut phase and reinventing the wheel with Facebook seemed too laborious. Plus uploading the pics on both and writing what i am upto at this precise moment didn't seem worth it. Ohh, I am aware that i don't have a clue as to what fun things that can done on Facebook - opening fortune cookies for instance, or, knowing how good my hindi is, based on some survey questions. Yes, i can live without that sort of fun in my life. So, I will hold off inundating my opinions on helpless souls on twitter, at least for the time being.
Time to read the next article - it is about MNS and Raj Thakre and Bombay/Mumbai debate. This sort of news really spoils my mood (meaning turns 'Good Morning' into just Morning). I think there is a simple way to deal with the problem of states like Maharashtra. The magic way is surprisingly through taxes. In the US, the taxes are classified into a State Tax and a Federal Tax. Here, we have just one lumped component. Whatever tax money is generated, it goes straight to the central government, which then distributes the money to all the states. So, the states which are not doing well, have no incentive to do better - as in they will get money anyways. Whereas the star performing states are penalised. If the existing tax system is broken down into a State Tax component and Central Government tax component, then the money generated from the people working in the state goes to the state itself. Raj Thakre or any other politician would not have any reason to complain about north indians and would infact invite peope to come as it would mean more money for the state. Other states would also be nudged to do better as they would have to create an infrastructure that keeps people in their own state. So it is a win-win situation for all. It looks like a surprisingly simple solution for our problems and one that is already employed in the US. I dont know why we are offended to take precedence from the US. We borrowed heavily in each sphere from the UK. Why not think of solutions to our problems from other nations too? And we could take only the Good. For instance, we are better off staying away from the Social Security System in the US or the healthcare system in the UK - as we can now see - that they are counterbeneficial in the long run. But the Good things we can employ. We already borrow liberally from Hollywood (Amitabh Bachchan, Aamir Khan have gone on record spouting anger on mention of Bollywood and maintained that it should be 'Hindi Cinema', methinks, first stop copying on a consistent basis and ppl will call you Hindi Cinema (smile)). So, back to borrowing the Good, I think we can try to see whether such a system can benefit us and infact encourage our states to do better.
Too much thinking for a Sunday morning. I decide to give up the newspaper and switch on the television. What do i see. No it is not National Geographic. But it is a good guess. The television is beaming pictures of 'Rakhi Sawant'. She seems to be man-handling a child. I wonder who entrusted their child to her. I switch channels - guess what - it is Rakhi Sawant's mom being booted off Big Boss. I switch off the TV set. I infact make the effort of putting a dust cover on the TV set, so that i can wipe off the images from my mind. Did U2 's Bono have this Sunday in mind when he sang - Sunday, Bloody Sunday??